Notes · Journal ·
Logbook 2026-11-04
Reading the reviews had become the weak spot. Each one is a Markdown file, and even in a good preview, a page with quotes, links to notes and sections to weigh doesn’t make for comfortable reading. I also wanted to read them away from my desk, and above all to answer them: decide on a point right where I read it, so that Claude can act on it afterwards.
So each review now has a private page of its own. It opens with a short summary in French, then the review itself. The notes it cites open at a tap, beside the text, with their sources. Every point that waits for my decision, a change proposed to a validated note or a possible next step, carries its own answer buttons and room for a comment.
What I value most is how integrated it feels. There’s no back and forth between tools, and no need to describe which passage my remark is about: I answer on the point itself. It’s the same convenience I liked in commenting directly on the canvas in Claude Design, which I wrote about in an earlier entry.

I’m looking forward to my first review in this format, and to sharing my first impressions of the experience.
A small nod to finish: the page borrows the visual identity of this site, its paper, its ink and its square cells. Little by little, the pieces I’m building start to belong to one ecosystem.