Feed · new posts

Notes · Journal ·

Logbook 2026-11-04

personal knowledge base

Reading the reviews had become the weak spot. Each one is a Markdown file, and even in a good preview, a page with quotes, links to notes and sections to weigh doesn’t make for comfortable reading. I also wanted to read them away from my desk, and above all to answer them: decide on a point right where I read it, so that Claude can act on it afterwards.

So each review now has a private page of its own. It opens with a short summary in French, then the review itself. The notes it cites open at a tap, beside the text, with their sources. Every point that waits for my decision, a change proposed to a validated note or a possible next step, carries its own answer buttons and room for a comment.

What I value most is how integrated it feels. There’s no back and forth between tools, and no need to describe which passage my remark is about: I answer on the point itself. It’s the same convenience I liked in commenting directly on the canvas in Claude Design, which I wrote about in an earlier entry.

The building blocks of the review page, shown with placeholder content

I’m looking forward to my first review in this format, and to sharing my first impressions of the experience.

A small nod to finish: the page borrows the visual identity of this site, its paper, its ink and its square cells. Little by little, the pieces I’m building start to belong to one ecosystem.